Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
International Political Science Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Daddieh, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Shaw, T. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Political Economy of Decision-Making in African Foreign Policy

Recognition of Biafra and the Popular Movement for the Liberation of Angola (MPLA)

Cyril Kofie Daddieh

Dalhousie University

Timothy M. Shaw

Centre for African Studies at Dalhousie University

Since the great wave of African independence in the early 1960s, the countries of this continent have been plagued by two important phenomena: the ghost of secession endangering the survival of existing states, and factionalization among the different contenders for power. This article analyzes Biafra's attempt to secede from Nigeria, and the fighting between the MPLA and other political organizations within Angola. The authors analyze the reactions and motives of different African states, within and outside the OAU, to each of these events. The political economy approach adopted here emphasizes the pressures on decision-making processes in "fragile" or "dependent" countries. Two conclusions emerge clearly (a) African foreign policies are elastic rather than static; and (b) unless vital interests are perceived in danger, African countries are reluctant to get entangled in conflicts outside their frontiers. Further close observation of African politics will be needed to know whether this tendency toward isolationism is a general characteristic, or only a function of a specific context.

International Political Science Review, Vol. 5, No. 1, 21-46 (1984)
DOI: 10.1177/019251218400500103


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?