This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Tanenhaus, J. Articles by Foley, M. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

"The Words of Things Entangle and Confuse"

The Ambiguous Political Concept

SUNY-Stony Brook

Mary Ann Foley

Department of Psychology at SUNY-Stony Brook

The validity of social science research based on interviews and questionnaires is threatened by the inclusion of ambiguous concepts which cannot be assumed to have the same connotations for all respondents. Recent developments in cognitive psychology offer the first satisfactory procedures for reducing these ambiguities. Using "the government in Washington" as the illustrative concept, we here show in two experiments how the ambiguities can be identified and reduced. The importance of using these techniques in preference to common survey approaches to ambiguity, such as the use of open-ended questions, is discussed.

International Political Science Review, Vol. 3, No. 1, 107-129 (1982)
DOI: 10.1177/019251218200300108


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?