This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Gauld, R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

One Country, Four Systems: Comparing Changing Health Policies in New Zealand

There is a growing literature in comparative health policy that analyzes the experiences of different countries. This article draws upon the comparative tradition, but has an intra-country focus. It considers the case of New Zealand, which has had four different public health sector structures in a decade, with fundamental changes enacted following general elections in 1990, 1996 and 1999. New Zealand's structures have included a system of locally based area health boards responsible for both funding and services delivery in their regions; a competitive, profit-oriented market system with separate agencies purchasing and providing health-care services; a centralized system with one corporate agency planning for population needs and purchasing services from a range of providers; and a system in which planning and purchasing is devolved to district boards. In tandem with the constant restructurings, a variety of policy and service innovations have emerged in areas such as the organization of primary-care physicians, indigenous Maori health care, pharmaceutical purchasing and the prioritization of services and patients. First, the article reviews the field of comparative health policy studies. Next, it outlines New Zealand's four health sector structures. Lastly, the article discusses the performance, implications and lessons of New Zealand's successive health sector changes.

Key Words: Comparative health • Health policy • Health system • New Zealand • Restructuring

International Political Science Review, Vol. 24, No. 2, 199-218 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0192512103024002003


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Gauld The Unintended Consequences of New Zealand's Primary Health Care Reforms Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 2008; 33(1): 93 - 115. [Abstract] [PDF]