Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
International Political Science Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Tverdova, Y. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Winners, Losers, and Attitudes about Government in Contemporary Democracies

Christopher J. Anderson

Yuliya V. Tverdova

The article compares the effect of political majority and minority status on attitudes toward government in mature and newly established democracies. Specifically, it examines whether being in the majority translates into more positive attitudes toward government than being in the minority. Using surveys conducted by the International Social Survey Project (ISSP) in 12 democracies in 1996, it finds that being in the majority generally translates into more positive attitudes toward government. However, this effect is not of uniform magnitude across countries, nor does it affect all attitudes toward government equally. Specifically, the data show that being in the political majority or minority strongly affects attitudes toward the performance of the political system and the power of government, but does not affect people's levels of political efficacy in systematic ways.

Key Words: Elections • Government trust • Political trust • Satisfaction • Winners and losers

International Political Science Review, Vol. 22, No. 4, 321-338 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0192512101022004003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
C. J. Tolbert, D. A. Smith, and J. C. Green
Strategic Voting and Legislative Redistricting Reform: District and Statewide Representational Winners and Losers
Political Research Quarterly, March 1, 2009; 62(1): 92 - 109.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
S. Zmerli and K. Newton
Social Trust and Attitudes Toward Democracy
Public Opin Q, December 1, 2008; 72(4): 706 - 724.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
C. S. Weissert and K. Halperin
The Paradox of Term Limit Support: To Know Them Is NOT to Love Them
Political Research Quarterly, September 1, 2007; 60(3): 516 - 530.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
S. C. Craig, M. D. Martinez, J. Gainous, and J. G. Kane
Winners, Losers, and Election Context: Voter Responses to the 2000 Presidential Election
Political Research Quarterly, December 1, 2006; 59(4): 579 - 592.
[Abstract] [PDF]