Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
International Political Science Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brecher, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Crisis Escalation: Model and Findings

Michael Brecher

The concept, crisis escalation, has three distinct but closely-related meanings: change from incipient to full-scale crisis; change from non-violence to violence; and change from no/low violence to severe violence. These are examined through a model of crisis escalation and a group of seven hypotheses derived from the model.

Testing of the propositions on crisis escalation with the evidence from 388 international crises and 829 foreign policy crises from the end of 1918 to the end of 1988 reveals strong support for most of the postulated linkages in the crisis escalation model. Moreover, the evidence from ten indepth case studies indicates a widely shared pattern of coping with high stress, despite notable diversity in crisis attributes. This finding challenges conventional wisdom about how states cope with foreign policy crises.

International Political Science Review, Vol. 17, No. 2, 215-230 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/019251296017002006


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
S.-W. Choi and P. James
Civil Military Structure, Political Communication, and the Democratic Peace
Journal of Peace Research, January 1, 2008; 45(1): 37 - 53.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
T. S. Sechser
Are Soldiers Less War-Prone than Statesmen?
Journal of Conflict Resolution, October 1, 2004; 48(5): 746 - 774.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
A. Arian and S. Olzaeker
Political and Economic Interactions with National Security Opinion: The Gulf War Period in Israel
Journal of Conflict Resolution, February 1, 1999; 43(1): 58 - 77.
[Abstract] [PDF]